Description
Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in appraising data to improve population health outcomes. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared. This discussion will support the professional formation of the nurse practitioner (NP) role.
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- CO 1: Analyze pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with selected disease states across the lifespan.
- CO 2: Examine the way in which homeostatic, adaptive, and compensatory physiological mechanisms can be supported and/or altered through specific therapeutic interventions across the lifespan.
- CO 3: Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states across the lifespan.
- CO 4: Integrate advanced pathophysiological concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of health problems in selected populations.
- CO 5: Relate research findings to the management of patients with complex pathophysiologic dysfunction.
Due Date
Initial posts are due to the discussion forum by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Instructor and peer responses are due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Students must post on a minimum of two separate days. A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday (i.e., the student will receive an automatic 0).
Total Points Possible: 50
Preparing the Assignment
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the discussion. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
General Instructions
This discussion represents the third and final step in a three-step discussion series where you will choose your pathophysiology adventure to analyze and present to the class. You will continue to explore the disease process that you chose in Week 2. In this final step of the discussion series, you will present the case study that you created in Week 5 on your chosen disease process from Week 2 to the class using the required templateLinks to an external site.Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader . Your presentation will be recorded in video format using Kaltura and should be presented as if you are teaching the client who was just diagnosed with your chosen condition from Week 2 and their family. You will then do a peer review for another student who chose a different condition. This link Links to an external site.can provide information on how to use Kaltura to record your presentation after signing in with your Chamberlain University student credentials.
Include the following sections:
1. Application of Course
- Prepare a presentation using the required templateLinks to an external site.Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader . The presentation should incorporate the case study you created in Week 5 and the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of your selected condition as if you are teaching it to the client in the case study. For images of the client for the case study, free stock images are available from Adobe StockLinks to an external site..
- Record your presentation in a video format (~2-5 min) using Kaltura. Ensure clarity in the audio and visual elements of the presentation.
- Submit the Kaltura recording link of your presentation in your discussion post.
- After posting your presentation link, watch the presentation of one of your classmates with a different condition. Provide a response to their post offering constructive feedback focusing on the accuracy of the information, their presentation skills, and whether the presentation is appropriately targeted to the client in the case study.
2. Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectationsLinks to an external site.:
- Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.
- Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.
- Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.
- Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
- Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.
3. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage peers and faculty by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.
- Peer Response: Respond to at least one peer on a topic other than the initially assigned topic.
- Faculty Response: Respond to at least one faculty post.
- Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice.
4. Professionalism in Communication: Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
5. Reference Citation: Use current APA format to format citations and references free of errors.
6. Wednesday Participation Requirement: Provide a
7. Total Participation Requirement: Provide at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a faculty question) on two different days during the week.
**To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.
Solution:NR507 Week 7 Discussion Choose Your Own Pathophysiology Adventure: Part 3 of 3

Add to Cart to get full solution
Related:(Completed) NR507 Week 5 Discussion Choose Your Own Pathophysiology Adventure: Part 2 of 3




Reviews
There are no reviews yet.