Description

NURS 6053 Module 4 Assignment Workplace Environment Assessment

Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.

In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
• Review the Work Environment Assessment Template*.
• Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
• Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
  • Clark (2019)
  • Hover and Williams (2022)
  • Lee and Miller (2022)
  • McDermott, Bernard, and Hathaway (2021)

*Template completed in the Week 7 discussion should not be submitted with this assignment.

The Assignment (3-6 pages total):

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)

• Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
• Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
• Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
• Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

• Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
• Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
• Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)

• Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
• Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

Solution: NURS 6053 Module 4 Assignment Workplace Environment Assessment

Introduction

A healthy workplace climate is a prerequisite for enhancing staff member well-being, fellowship, and company accomplishment, especially at healthcare facilities such as WISH, where staff interprofessional cooperation directly identifies patient outcomes. The Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory and other models, such as the model of civility and respect developed by Cynthia Clark, are vital instruments that enable the evaluation and improvement of working environments. This paper defines strengths and areas of improvement in WISH by assessing its work environment, which received a moderately healthy score of 82 out of 100. The paper argues that the introduction of the structured mentoring programs, inclusive governance practices, team-building workshops, and diversity training, following the civility framework designed by Clark and supported by the literature, will improve the organizational health of WISH and lead to high-performance interprofessional teams in the contexts of the WHO Healthy Workplace Model, which focuses on the idea of the supportive and equitable working conditions.

Work Environment Evaluation

The Work Environment Assessment, based on the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, was applied to my workplace, WISH, and it was rated 82, indicating a moderately healthy work environment. The employee appreciation, teamwork, and fair treatment all score 5, which reflects a solid culture of respect and cooperation. Additionally, there was a high score of 4 in terms of open communication and emphasis on wellness, which further strengthened a healthy environment. However, many others, including mentoring, shared governance, and competitive pay, were also graded as neutral, with a mark of 3 emphasizing that they should address the issue of career development and employee participation in the decision-making process more actively. These findings indicate that a work environment that supports excellent interpersonal relationships needs to improve the prospects of professional development and involvement to take its health and civility to the next level.

There were two shocking results that I was not expecting regarding the neutrality of the mentoring score (3) and shared governance (3). A moderately healthy workplace, such as WISH, would do better in its mentoring program because the company focuses on worker support. In the same way, the neutral score of the shared governance was a surprise, considering that I expected more involvement of employees in making decisions. Among the beliefs that were validated as per the assessment was the existence of transparent communication. I have been confident that WISH has an open and healthy, polite communications channel, which turned out to be true as the score of 4 confirms that, which is standard practice in the workplace, whereby so much communication is direct, and a healthy workplace ensures an effective direct communication channel…

Add to cart to get full solution

Related:(Completed) NURS 6053 Module 5 Assignment Change Implementation and Management Plan